Quite honestly, I'm not sure how I feel about the concept of sainthood at all. I think the fact that it elevates humans to almost God-like levels is problematic. And inevitable, with such a stringent process to ordain "saints" exemplary and devout people will be passed over. I think the Church would be better suited by paying special honor to individuals who deserve it. It is nice, after all, for us to have concrete, relatable examples of people whose lives we should emulate. But having such a complex process to achieve a title as holy as "saint" is, in my opinion, too much.
It is somewhat surprising, though refreshing, that a conservative Cardinal would champion the campaign to canonize Dorothy Day. However, I have a lot of respect for the fact that Cardinal Dolan can look past the negative in her life and focus on all of the good she did. It makes sense that he sees her work as particularly relevant in the political and social climate of today. For many, Dorothy Day might bridge the gap that the article references between the social justice leftists and the pro-life conservatives.
Being a Catholic "saint" means simply living out Christ's mission in the best way you know how. It doesn't mean you has to move to India and build orphanages or join a cloistered monastery (although some people are certainly called to do so) to live a holy life. Dorothy Day lived this idea fully, doing everything she could to help those around her and spread the message of Catholic Social Teachings throughout her community.
I very much agree with your idea about sainthood! I believe as human beings, we are all flawed and therefore should not be held up to such a God-like standard. I think the process of canonizing saints is way too drawn out also. Canoniation can also be very political, in that it requires a lot of support, time, and money.
ReplyDelete